Aetna Investigation Highlights Need for Better Ethical Decision Making
Aetna Insurance Company is under investigation after a former medical director has admitted in official testimony that he denied insurance claims for medical coverage without ever reviewing the medical records himself. Aetna’s tepid response thus far is that the doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals work collaboratively in the decision-making process. Dr. Jay Ken Iinuma is now under investigation by California’s insurance commissioner Dave Jones. Dr. Iinuma’s testimony was taken during a deposition in the lawsuit that was filed by Gillen Washington, a college student, “who was denied coverage for an infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin, a treatment for an immune disorder from which he suffers.” See “Aetna Under Investigation After Former Exec Admits Denying Care Without Reading Patient’s Records.” By, Natasha Bach. www.fortune.com. February 12, 2018. The testimony was eventually played for the insurance commissioner in California, Dave Jones, who has now launched the inquiry into Aetna’s practices. While Aetna has a thorough code of ethics, employees seem to lack good ethical decision making.
What immediately comes to mind is that Aetna is defending the doctor and its policies. How does a huge insurance provider such as Aetna employ a doctor to determine coverage on illnesses for which he has no knowledge? I examined Aetna’s company policies which includes a Code of Conduct titled “Excellence in Integrity.” Within its lengthy Code of Conduct, there is a specific section titled “Our Ethical Decision Making Framework” that lays out Aetna’s working definition of ethics which states that all employees must be guided by The Aetna Way in conducting Aetna’s business. This means that all employees:
- Are clear, open, and honest
- Keep our promises
- Are fair in our dealings with others
- Uphold our legal obligations
AND its framework for making ethical decision making states that “[w]hen faced with business decisions that have ethical implications, we involve the right people in considering the following questions:
- Should I be troubled by this? Is this consistent with Aetna’s commitment to integrity? Is it really an issue? Am I genuinely perplexed, or am I afraid to do what is right?
- Who will be affected by my decisions? How will they be affected? What will be the impact if I act, or decide not to act? Consider the Golden Rule (Treat others as you would like to be treated).
- What is my responsibility to act? What will happen if I don’t act? Have I caused the problem, or has someone else? How far should I go in resolving the issue? How serious a problem is it? If it is not my problem, will someone else take action if I don’t?
- What are the ethical considerations? Is it a question of legal obligations, fairness, promise keeping, honesty, doing good, or avoiding harm?
- Who needs to be involved in making this decision? Should I consult with my manager, Compliance Officer, internal legal counsel, the HR Contact Center? If I am afraid to raise this issue, should I anonymously call AlertLine®?
- Am I being true to myself and The Aetna Way? How would my actions appear to customers or the public? What kind of person or company would do what I am contemplating? Have I made the right decision for the right reason? Would I be proud to share my decision with my family? With coworkers? With regulators or public officials? How would I feel if it were reported on the front page of the newspaper?
The Need for Better Ethical Decision Making
I now have the opportunity to address groups large and small in every industry, I vulnerably share my story and the bad decisions I made along my journey. I examine the factors and influences that ultimately affected and clouded my judgment when decisions needed to be made almost a decade ago, regardless of my education and cultural background. I recognize that I did not engage in any ethical decision making process as I was overconfident in my morality and certainly didn’t even recognize that I needed to actually pause and listen to my inner voice and reflect upon the ethical realities of each situation. I was a solo practitioner in a legal industry dominated by bigger and more experienced and established law firms. I made assumptions and rationalizations along the way.
But, upon researching Aetna, it is crystal clear that any employee, executive, or doctor/nurse can revisit Aetna’s code of conduct and ethical decision making framework because clearly Dr. Iinuma could not be seen as adhering to the guidance set forth in its stated code of conduct. Or is it possible that similar to so many other corporations who have undergone investigation, the written statements are merely to check a required box that the government and regulators have mandated? Do companies that institute such written guidance determine that this one act satisfied the need for an ethics training program and compliance training? If the doctor’s testimony is true, then Aetna actually trains its employees to act in complete opposition to its code of conduct and ethical decision making framework.
What is markedly apparent is the ongoing need to create a culture of conversation around ethical decision making. To role play, have round-tables, discuss case studies of real life examples, and think through the consequences of possible scenarios. From C-suite to the boardroom to middle management to the front line, each person will learn and benefit from a long-term sustainable program that commits to transparent conversations, candor, and communication.
Rashmi Airan‘s mission is to share the need for ethical vigilance and to inspire you to make good ethical choices in all areas of your life. Rashmi is an ethics speaker and consultant fighting to create a culture of conversation and bring ethical issues in business to light, to promote integrity, to enhance commitment to fiduciary duty, to build ethical leadership, and to shift the paradigm of ethics standards through ethics training.
Subscribe to receive news and updates:
Posted by Internet Marketing Company, The Bart Organization.